Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Vibrato or Nonvibrato in Solo and Choral Singing: Is There Room for Both?

Vibrato or Non-vibrato in Solo and Choral Singing: Is There Room for Both? by Virginia Sublett

Does singing in ensembles affects vocal technique, especially with regard to non-vibrato singing? One panelist said that as teachers, our primary motivation should be to give the students what is best for them. So a question was raised: Does singing without vibrato ruin the voice?

As we’ve read, “pleasing” vibrato consists of five to eight pulsations per second. Fewer than five are usually considered a “wobble,” and more than eight move toward what we would call a “tremolo.”

Things that affect vibrato rates:
·      Taste (more or less vibrato)
·      Type (style) of music
·      The singer’s level of excitement
·      Cultural factors

Although some believe that non-vibrato singing can be harmful, there doesn’t seem to be much research in support of this idea. Since there is a lack of research, we can only approach this subject from an anecdotal or preferential standpoint.

In choral music, the issue of volume/vibrato/intonation is important. Before the concert hall was invented, choral music was performed in churches, small court halls, or rooms in private houses. Because of the smaller spaces, the voices of singers were “lifted” with little effort on the performers part. The precise articulation, dissonance, and detailed effects in choral music required pure, clear voices to achieve these things.

Vibrato that is used currently in standard operatic literature was not always the norm, but as orchestras and concert halls grew larger, the styles of singing changed. Large post-Romantic orchestras and large opera houses demanded more volume and intensity form singers, which encouraged the continuous use of vibrato.

Ultimately, style matters!!!

As voice teachers, we should help students achieve the aesthetic their choral directors are asking for in ways that will not compromise their development as solo singers.

·      Beyond the university, most student won’t continue to become professional opera singers, but they may sing in choirs in their community or churches. (It best serves the interests of students to help them sing healthily with minimal vibrato, if that style is being asked for in an ensemble setting)
·      Singing with minimal vibrato does not tire the voice if done correctly.
o   Singing with excess tension does tire the voice
o   Students may respond to the request of “straight-tone” singing by tightening their jaw or muscles supporting the larynx
·      A less problematic instruction would be “sing with a pure, clear, focused tone that is right in the center of the pitch.”
·      Using different terminology can help eliminate problems
o    “Think pure and don’t push”
o   “Use a pure, spinning, well focused sound”

·      Tips for helping students maintain good vocal habits while singing in choir (with the goal of minimal vibrato tone in mind)

o   Adjusting vowel color (brighter vowels have less vibrato than dark)
o   Singing with less breath pressure
o   Smaller mouth position


Encourage students to explore all the different aspects of beauty in their voices. They don’t have to only use one. Stylistic versatility will lead to a more well-rounded singer.

Conclusion: The voice is a sturdy instrument that is capable of a greater range of sounds, timbres, and expressive devices than any other. There is a lack of research to validly discourage non-vibrato singing. The only argument against non-vibrato singing is aesthetic choice or issues of style. It would best serve the student if they are taught to efficiently switch between styles.


9 comments:

  1. This article makes a lot of sense. From what I've personally experienced, singing without vibrato can be controlled just like tone color can be modified and altered; it's a process that doesn't necessitate use of excess tension. If vibrato is taken out of the voice by tensing the mechanism, of course it's bad! But if practically anything is done to the voice by tensing the mechanism, it's bad. Vibratoless singing, however, can be quite beautiful and effective, and even necessary stylistically quite often, and is eminently produceable without excess tension.

    I particularly liked the potential comments to try and help reduce tension, including emphasis on "pure," and "focused," not tight to take vibrato out.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is a great article. It will be fun discussing this in class even after we sort of went over it last time. I think it is important to learn how to sing in a choir correctly with straight tone before just trying it. Many singers demonstrate this the wrong way which can lead to a tired voice. It is a very useful and helpful skill to have for the future!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think the idea of using different terminology is a good idea. Instead of saying to sing with straight tone, asking for a pure, focused sound is good. The only problem for me, is that I personally feel like I can sing with a pure focused sound that has more vibrato than is desirable in a choral setting. I feel like it will probably always be difficult for singers with voices leaning toward the larger side to comfortably sing in a choir setting, though I know plenty of people would disagree with that.

    Sometimes I think that asking larger voices to sing at a softer dynamic works to blend in. If I don't think about straight tone, but instead try to sing at a softer dynamic (but still in the encompass of what my voice wants to naturally do), it seems to blend quite well.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think it's interesting to ask voice teachers to teach with a straight tone approach when the end goal in solo singing is to foster a healthy sound for solo singing. I understand teaching a student ways to sing in straight tone to foster healthy choral technique but I think using descriptors in rehearsal may be more beneficial then wasting time trying to develop it in private lessons.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Vibrato and non-vibrato singing, in my opinion, is almost purely style. I mean, yeah, you can have a preference of how you would like to sing, but depending on what you are singing there is a color and characteristic you would have to follow. Most of us can agree that singing with vibrato is easier, but at times when it is necessary (specifically Bach now) "straight tone" is the characteristic. If we choose to sing with vibrato you start losing the artistic integrity that is the song. And that's no good.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I like the idea of talking about vibrato in a stylistic sense as oppose to a there-or-not sort of mentality. It is certainly dependent on the style of music being performed. In terms of having vibrato in your choir, it would only make sense to approach it in the same way as individual instruction. If they cannot effectively and naturally produce vibrato, they should not be using it because it causes more harm than good. In other words, asking a choir to sing with vibrato on a Romantic piece when they do not know how to use it is unhealthy, though it is stylistically correct. I know that I personally do not produce a natural vibrato and have to make a conscious effort to implement it into my singing, so on the flip side, someone like me adding vibrato to a piece that calls for it may be more harmful than helpful. I think it is important to know where your students stand in their vocal development in order to produce a healthy sound that is also stylistically appropriate.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Style seems like the biggest factor in when and how much vibrato to use. I know it was hard for me to find the vibrato in the beginning, but for others it is hard to turn off. I really liked the use of words like focused and pure to reach the minimal vibrato needed in specific styles.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I know that especially in ensembles like chamber choir, singing with or without vibrato is always an interesting issue of debate. Here's my thought: in ensembles, healthy singing should ALWAYS occur. This means that if, stylistically, vibrato should be limited, then it is the director's responsibility to teach his/her singers how to do that in a healthy way- especially for those singers with big voices and a lot of vibrato. I like that this article provides tips for that

    ReplyDelete
  9. I always want to encourage healthy singing no matter the style but being someone with a large instrument and present vibrato, I sometimes find it difficult to not use my vibrato. I am able to get just a nice spin in my voice for Whitacre and Bach, but at the end of a two hour rehearsal singing like that, my voice is just exhausted. I have to use more air/breath support in order to get that sound and restrict a lot of the natural sound production that wants to come out. It's such a tough situation because you need to be able to blend with a choir but you also need to do what is healthy for your voice. I think this will always be a huge topic of discussion/debate.

    ReplyDelete