Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Femal Chest Voice
The article "Female Chest Voice" addresses the potential pros and cons of the female chest voice, comparing the thoughts of Gwenellyn Leonard, a voice teacher who has taught at Uof O, Linfield and Oberlin Conservatory of Music, and Freda Herseth, a widely known mezzo and voice faculty at Univ. of Michigan.
Leonard states that the female voice should be seamless when passing through registers, and that that should be the ultimate goal. Being comfortable switching registers needs to come first, which is then implemented by scale equalization, which is singing a scale evenly, bridging that gap between chest and mixed voice, and then mixed to head voice. When discussing it anatomically, what should happen with the larynx is that when singing an ascending scale, the cricothyroid moves down toward the thyroid and the cricoid moves up, successfully stretching the vocal folds as the voice moves higher up the scale. Leonard also talks about how important the phonatory, breathing and posture processes are in successful register switches.
Freda Herseth mentions that use of the chest voice, or of mixed voice, is essential for giving whatever piece is being sung, the emotional drive it needs, with "the goosebumps or the unexpected welling up of tears." She asserts that most audiences don't just want to hear high, floaty soprano pieces or arias that hang out in the upper staff area and that they need those warm, resonant sounds well. However, Herseth also mentions that singing or speaking predominantly in the chest voice can cause fatigue and vocal faults. Developing strength in the speaking chest voice and utilizing vocal exercises will result in further strength in the singing chest voice. The correct repertoire is also of huge importance. Giving a student a piece of music with a recording, and telling them to mimic what they hear, is not always a good step. The student needs to be in tune with all of the healthy ways of using the chest voice, the muscles and other behaviors to sing correctly. Otherwise, they could be trying to tackle too big of a task too early on. Overall, Leonard and Herseth agree that when engaged correctly, women singing in their chest voice, or mixed voice, can be ultimately beautiful and bring a lot more presence with the character and emotion of a piece of music.
Teaching Methods for Correcting Probematic Vibrato
Teaching Methods for Correcting Probematic Vibrato
Adam Kirkpatrick
-Vibrato is difficult because it doesn’t exist in every day speaking
(maybe during heightened emotion i.e. ‘I have a dream’)
-One Theory: Vibrato is caused by the crico-thyroid muscle.
It becomes tense when elongating the cords.
Important to note about muscles in the body – when they are
tense, the tension is not continuous. It oscillates. Constantly flexing and releasing.
Creepy example: Getting shocked by an electric outlet. Your
muscles react to this by contracting and releasing in time with the electric
current. This happens on a small level every time a muscle in your body is
engaged.
Crico-thyroids and Thyro-arytenoids work in opposition of
each other. Muscle antagonism must exist for them to sustain a position which
sustains a pitch. They flex and release, oscillating the tension. One group of
muscles can’t become too rigid or overpowering or the balance between them is
lost.
Vibrato expresses itself naturally when there is the proper
balance of airflow and sublglottic pressure.
Thinking about airflow vs.sublgottic pressure:
Think about the same volume of air passing through a large opening
and then through a straw. (This opening represents the glottis.) The air
passing through the straw will have more force, velocity and pressure.
Excessive airflow in relation to sublottic pressure-à straight tone
Excessive subglottic pressure in relation to airflow-à wobble
Other causes of straight tone-
-high laryngeal position (Krikpatrick suggests that they ‘cry’
or ‘whine’ as they sing)
-sometimes just when a singer is running out of breath you
hear their natural vibrato come in. Something releases or lets go.
-He suggests you never say “sing with vibrato” , leads to a
fake one. Find out the problem or have them experiment with held notes so the
vibrato can emerge naturally
Faux vibrato-
Creating vibrato with pulses in the abdominal muscles.
Bleat-
Pressed tone and lots of airflow - lots of air with a lot of
resistance. Try experimenting with sighs.
Bottom line- vibrato is the result of balanced
phonation and breath support, it’s an indicator of good singing, not something
that should be manufactured or recreated.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Vibrato or Nonvibrato in Solo and Choral Singing: Is There Room for Both?
Vibrato or Non-vibrato in
Solo and Choral Singing: Is There Room for Both? by Virginia Sublett
Does singing in ensembles affects
vocal technique, especially with regard to non-vibrato singing? One panelist
said that as teachers, our primary motivation should be to give the students
what is best for them. So a question was raised: Does singing without vibrato
ruin the voice?
As we’ve read, “pleasing” vibrato
consists of five to eight pulsations per second. Fewer than five are usually
considered a “wobble,” and more than eight move toward what we would call a
“tremolo.”
Things that affect vibrato rates:
·
Taste (more or less vibrato)
·
Type (style) of music
·
The singer’s level of excitement
·
Cultural factors
Although some believe that
non-vibrato singing can be harmful, there doesn’t seem to be much research in
support of this idea. Since there is a lack of research, we can only approach
this subject from an anecdotal or preferential standpoint.
In choral music, the issue of
volume/vibrato/intonation is important. Before the concert hall was invented,
choral music was performed in churches, small court halls, or rooms in private
houses. Because of the smaller spaces, the voices of singers were “lifted” with
little effort on the performers part. The precise articulation, dissonance, and
detailed effects in choral music required pure, clear voices to achieve these
things.
Vibrato that is used currently
in standard operatic literature was not always the norm, but as orchestras and
concert halls grew larger, the styles of singing changed. Large post-Romantic
orchestras and large opera houses demanded more volume and intensity form
singers, which encouraged the continuous use of vibrato.
Ultimately, style
matters!!!
As voice teachers, we should help
students achieve the aesthetic their choral directors are asking for in ways
that will not compromise their development as solo singers.
·
Beyond the university, most student won’t
continue to become professional opera singers, but they may sing in choirs in
their community or churches. (It best serves the interests of students to help
them sing healthily with minimal vibrato, if that style is being asked for in
an ensemble setting)
·
Singing with minimal vibrato does not tire the
voice if done correctly.
o
Singing with excess tension does tire the voice
o
Students may respond to the request of
“straight-tone” singing by tightening their jaw or muscles supporting the
larynx
·
A less problematic instruction would be “sing
with a pure, clear, focused tone that is right in the center of the pitch.”
·
Using different terminology can help eliminate
problems
o
“Think
pure and don’t push”
o
“Use a pure, spinning, well focused sound”
·
Tips for helping students maintain good vocal
habits while singing in choir (with the goal of minimal vibrato tone in mind)
o
Adjusting vowel color (brighter vowels have less
vibrato than dark)
o
Singing with less breath pressure
o
Smaller mouth position
Encourage students to explore all
the different aspects of beauty in their voices. They don’t have to only use
one. Stylistic versatility will lead to a more well-rounded singer.
Conclusion: The voice is a sturdy
instrument that is capable of a greater range of sounds, timbres, and
expressive devices than any other. There is a lack of research to validly
discourage non-vibrato singing. The only argument against non-vibrato singing
is aesthetic choice or issues of style. It would best serve the student if they
are taught to efficiently switch between styles.
Monday, February 25, 2013
The Female Primo Passaggio: A Survey of Its Physiology, Psychology, and Pedagogy,
The Female Primo Passaggio: A Survey of Its Physiology, Psychology, and Pedagogy,
by Elena BIyskal
This article is filled with technical lingo and explanations surrounding the issue of the "break" in women's (mostly younger women's) voices.
Breaks and Registration:
- The "break" is where women struggle with the differences between head and chest voice, and how to "register" the notes they're singing depending on where they lie in their range.
- "Register" is a dangerous term as it has 5 different definitions, causing confusion. Blyskal says: "if individuals rely on vocal breaks to define their registers, it is no wonder that the transitions become so conspicuous."
- In order to avoid the register break, students should aim to sing a natural, seamless sound throughout the entire range without consciously altering her voice to account for the break.
- Avoid gear-shifting
- Registration must be acknowledged and defined: "Registers are defined by laryngeal function... [and] resonance."
- Understanding the vocal folds' is paramount: The two pairs of primary laryngeal muscles are the thyroarytenoids (colloquially, the shorteners) and cricothyroids (the lengtheners)
Register Break Down:
- Although there are four generally accepted voice registers, only two are involved with the female primo passaggio: The "lower" and the "Upper" registers.
- The "lower" register has the thyroarytenoids more prominently contracted, making the folds shorter and thicker. The lower range of fundamental frequencies combined with strengthened higher harmonics result in a thick, rich, ringing sound.
- The "Upper" register is usually considered cricothyroid-dominant: the cricothyroids contract as the pitch ascends, placing greater tension upon the vocal ligaments. The folds become longer and thinner, creating fewer intense partials and a more flutelike tone.
Study Discoveries:
- "Thyroarytenoids are chiefly responsible for registration, antagonized by the cricothyroids as a pitch agent. It is the degree of thyroarytenoid activity—or lack thereof—that allows for a register change."
- Mix is produced mostly in either one register or the other. It is not really the combination of chest and head voice.
"Mix"ed Register:
- Mix" is a concept widely used to camoflouge break.
- while mixed voice is primarily produced in one register, the singer can imitate the characteristics of the other register by modifying the sound's intensity, balancing the ratio between fullness and airiness."
- Ex: Kristin Chenoweth sings mostly in head voice, but places it forward enough that it projects and comes across as a "beltier", more musical theater sound
Smoothing out the Break:
- The singer can learn to smooth her transition not only by relaxing the laryngeal muscles, but also by formant tuning.
- Formant tuning can be achieved through vowel modification.
- Berton Coffin created the "Chromatic Vocal Chart", that showed which vowels would best resonate the fundamental frequency and harmonics on any note in a singer's range.
- Regarding the passaggio, Coffin discovered that the female voice is narrower in the middle range while being wider and rounder at the top and bottom.
- Based on his chart, Coffin recommended that the female singer vocalize in the primo passaggio on alternating front and neutral vowels (/i/ and /u/ coupled with ¡a/ and /e/) to gain flexibility.
Big Idea:
- The closer the formant is to the fundamental frequency, the more resonant the vowel becomes—essentially louder, purer in tone, and easier to sing.
- This is why "i" and "u" are so helpful in bringing tone forward amidst the break.
Physiological Issues associated with working through the transition point:
- Young singers often attempt to accomplish intervals with a subconscious change in head position—either elevating the head for ascending pitch changes, or depressing the head to "dig" for lower pitches.
- The head and neck are crucial to positioning the larynx correctly: have the student focus on keeping her head relaxed.
- Appoggio breath management: "A uniformly resonant timbre is not possible unless breath energy is adjusted to match voice registration requirements."
- When females sing exclusively in their lower range (which can be more comfortable at younger ages), they make accessing their head voice much more difficult.
- The development of the lower range is only detrimental if it is the only area young women sing in. It is still a natural part of the voice that should be utilized properly.
- The female voice undergoes mutation in various ways: the trachea lengthens, the laryngeal muscles grow, the vocal folds thicken, and the larynx itself increases in size from twenty to thirty percent
Physiological Issues with working through the transition point:
- Not thinking about switching registers is actually a good thing, and can help to make the switch more discreet.
- For most female singers, the register break usually rears its head during adolescence, bringing about embarrassment due to the cracking and changing in their voice.
- Many young women think that the belty chest sound is the best way to sing because many of their vocal models sing that way. Make sure to encourage them and inform them that "lighter" singing in the head voice is beautiful too!
Tips to working with young females in choir:
- With young choirs, it is smart to not classify your women. Instead, divide all the women into 2 groups, and have them switch who takes soprano and who takes alto on different songs.
- No exercise should be used to point out and focus on the few pitches that mark the transition point: octaves, arpeggios, and legato scales can be used to smooth it out.
A true life lesson to sum up the article:
- "To guide a student through this transition is not only smoothing out a technicality, but also encouraging growth in being human—acknowledging weaknesses, accepting them, and patiently working through (not around) them to become stronger individuals."
P.S. Sorry this synopsis is giant and the video is a short film..... I didn't know what to do with all of the information.
Where's the line?
The article "The Speech Pathologist, the Singing Teacher, and the Singing Voice Specialist: Where’s the Line?" by Marina Gilman, John Nix, and Edie Hapner, dissects research findings related to the study of who should be responsible for treating or rehabilitating an individual with a vocal disorder. The research was conducted by sending a survey to the NATS mailing list and a separate survey to 156 speech pathologists.
Speech-language pathologists have the technical knowledge and the accreditation to work on voice disorders but not all work with singers. In fact, only about 2/3 of the surveyed pathologists had vocal experience (music degree, two or more years of private lessons, or professional experience).
On the other hand voice teachers have all the vocal experience but no accreditation, no standard. They don't even have to be apart of NATS. However the biggest reason they can't be considered a singing voice specialist is because they don't have training in pathology.
So what exactly are the qualifications to be a singing voice specialist? Marina Gilman, John Nix, and Edie Hapner believe that "the singing voice specialist should be someone who has knowledge of voice technique, understands the vocal demands of professional singing, and possesses a comprehensive knowledge of voice disorders, including how the disorders impact vocal fold vibration, resonance, and overall function, in addition to clinical management skills". So do any members of the above groups have all of these skills? I think not.
In order to fix the confusion of who is a specialist and who is not it must be decided: what the definition of a singing voice specialist is; what their qualifications must be; and how someone will be certified. And for the well being of all singing voices it is high time to reopen this topic and come to a consensus of what it means to be a singing voice specialist.
Sunday, February 24, 2013
Choral Conductor as Teacher of Vocal Technique
It has been suggested by research that the threat to vocal health in choral singing lies in the fact that singers must sing loud enough to hear themselves over their neighbor, but this author claims the biggest threat lies in asking training musicians so sing at the technical level of amateur voices. In reality, the choral director should create a learning environment that allows less-proficient singers to sing more effectively. The three areas that should be focused on in choral exercises are:
1) Breath Management (onset, release, breath renewal),
2) Free Laryngeal Function, and
3) Resonance Balancing
The author suggests that choral directors should focus at least 5 minutes a day to each of these categories. While it can be difficult, at times, to rationalize 'giving up' rehearsal time to focus on these things, it is impossible for a director to expect excellent musicianship if (s)he does not teach it.
The Choir Issue, Part Two
This article presented an interesting followup to The Choir Issue, Part One.
Before addressing the specific topics of the article, let me just ask: was the article complete? All other NATS Journal articles have closed with a list of sources and a copyright statement; this one just cut off seemingly without conclusion. If there is more of it, it would be wonderful to see!
What We Sing
Repertoire is an important choice for both solo singing and choir. The article outlines that choosing pieces for students in choir and solo work must be accomplished with their actual level of development and ability in mind, as well as the consideration of personal vocal Fach. It points out that not only can giving students works that are outside their potential range and preferential Fach be discouraging, it can also be damaging to their developing voices.
Why We Sing
This section of the article deals with the reasons for the required participation of vocalists in ensembles at the university level. It mentions that ensembles do not tend to actually serve the needs of the student, but the other way around, developing a potentially discouraging atmosphere to singers in their development if the ensemble is not meeting their developmental needs as a singer.
Before addressing the specific topics of the article, let me just ask: was the article complete? All other NATS Journal articles have closed with a list of sources and a copyright statement; this one just cut off seemingly without conclusion. If there is more of it, it would be wonderful to see!
What We Sing
Repertoire is an important choice for both solo singing and choir. The article outlines that choosing pieces for students in choir and solo work must be accomplished with their actual level of development and ability in mind, as well as the consideration of personal vocal Fach. It points out that not only can giving students works that are outside their potential range and preferential Fach be discouraging, it can also be damaging to their developing voices.
Why We Sing
This section of the article deals with the reasons for the required participation of vocalists in ensembles at the university level. It mentions that ensembles do not tend to actually serve the needs of the student, but the other way around, developing a potentially discouraging atmosphere to singers in their development if the ensemble is not meeting their developmental needs as a singer.
The Economy of Choir Size
The Economy of Choir Size by Ingo R. Titze
This is a short article addressing the issue of choral dynamic range in relation to size of the choir.Titze points out, initially, that smaller ensembles are generally better suited for achieving special blend, precise tuning of harmonics, and particular intonation affects. My personal favorite- that an SATB choir must have at least four singers.
The main points of this article deal with larger choral ensembles and how their size affects the intensity of their sound. Titze first asserts that, "Choir size is driven by dynamic range and overall loudness." At first this was a little confusing to me but I think he means that, as directors, we decide how big we want our choirs to be based on our desired level of intensity for the group. Titze then provides three fundamental ways to increase choral dynamic range:
1. INCREASE DYNAMIC RANGE OF EACH SINGER'S VOICE
2. INCREASE THE SIZE OF THE CHOIR
3. DECREASE THE NOISE AND ABSORPTION OF SOUND IN PERFORMANCE ENVIRONMENT.
To imagine the interaction of these three factors, Titze asks his readers to imagine an experiment in an auditorium with decent acoustics. One person is there to listen and determine the perceptibility of dynamics. One singer sings at a true pp. That listener will not be able to hear it. Only when 18 singers are singing a true pp, will the sound become perceptible. For quiet dynamics, size of singers must be increased until the sound can be perceived by an audience. For loud dynamics, it doesn't take as many singers for a ff to be heard (surprise, surprise). Most interestingly, through a study involving math and science, Titze indicates that after 60 singers are singing, the addition of any more really doesn't add a dramatic amount of intensity of the sound. (see graph in video)
To summarize the article, choir size is optimized by testing performance environments for sound perceptibility and training each singer to improve their dynamic range. Little is gained by increasing size of choirs past 60 members because after 60, intensity of sound does not increase much.
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Technique or Testosterone
This article, Technique or Testosterone, deals with the reasoning behind why the male voice changes. More specifically, when it changes. Even more specifically, why it changes at a certain point of life.
There are two arguments: Puberty and Social Life Style.
The article gives an example of how boys would sing soprano up to the age of 16 or 17 in the prewar era (before WWII). Back then, the "old head tone" was a distinctive sound where people knew it was a boy who was singing and would not fade out during puberty. Whereas today, when we hear boys sing it is not what people would call "continental tone". It is described as "harsh incisive sound" that comes from the chest voice. Unlike "old head tone", "continental tone" fades away when puberty strikes.
Now this is where it gets interesting. There are researchers who are wondering why from prewar era to modern day do boys not have that "old head tone"...tone anymore. There are exceptions, but overall they just aren't how they used to make them. Although, this is just an example. The overall idea is the changing of the male voice through time. That is where puberty and lifestyle plays a role.
There is a belief that puberty is starting to come earlier than it used to. There is evidence that music directors are losing boys at younger ages due to puberty. There have been evidence that the average age for a boy to go through puberty was 14 in 1940, but in the present day it is 12. As most boys go through puberty, their voices change and it is harder to adapt their voices to children's music so they eventually grow out of it and have to find new music or even a new choir to perform with. However, OTHER researchers say that this is not the case and throwing around this sort of data is dangerous to put out there. By sending out this sort of information can hinder how a young boy grow by giving them attention, or lack of, that is unnecessary. There are differences between social classes and overall regions that researches have not put into account that make this sort of data meaningless and incomplete. They believe that the average age remains at 14 or so and has not changed since the 1940's.
Agency is the ability for a boy to act on their own decisions. Within their lives, they choose whether they do something or not. Puberty is shown that they have no control over how they sound, but their agency shows that they want something of their own. Choir boys were interviewed and some of they say that there are times where they are pressured into stop singing high or "like a girl" so they force themselves to sing low so they can fit in and not be made fun of. The choir directors or voice teachers are responsible for letting their students know that it is okay to sing either high or low and should not push for either one of them. They should allow their students to sing what they please without having to worry about the social ramification. As students are going through puberty, it may be smart to bring up the changes in their voices (especially if they are involved in voice performance) while they are learning how the growth they go through puberty.
What side are you on?
There are two arguments: Puberty and Social Life Style.
The article gives an example of how boys would sing soprano up to the age of 16 or 17 in the prewar era (before WWII). Back then, the "old head tone" was a distinctive sound where people knew it was a boy who was singing and would not fade out during puberty. Whereas today, when we hear boys sing it is not what people would call "continental tone". It is described as "harsh incisive sound" that comes from the chest voice. Unlike "old head tone", "continental tone" fades away when puberty strikes.
Now this is where it gets interesting. There are researchers who are wondering why from prewar era to modern day do boys not have that "old head tone"...tone anymore. There are exceptions, but overall they just aren't how they used to make them. Although, this is just an example. The overall idea is the changing of the male voice through time. That is where puberty and lifestyle plays a role.
There is a belief that puberty is starting to come earlier than it used to. There is evidence that music directors are losing boys at younger ages due to puberty. There have been evidence that the average age for a boy to go through puberty was 14 in 1940, but in the present day it is 12. As most boys go through puberty, their voices change and it is harder to adapt their voices to children's music so they eventually grow out of it and have to find new music or even a new choir to perform with. However, OTHER researchers say that this is not the case and throwing around this sort of data is dangerous to put out there. By sending out this sort of information can hinder how a young boy grow by giving them attention, or lack of, that is unnecessary. There are differences between social classes and overall regions that researches have not put into account that make this sort of data meaningless and incomplete. They believe that the average age remains at 14 or so and has not changed since the 1940's.
Agency is the ability for a boy to act on their own decisions. Within their lives, they choose whether they do something or not. Puberty is shown that they have no control over how they sound, but their agency shows that they want something of their own. Choir boys were interviewed and some of they say that there are times where they are pressured into stop singing high or "like a girl" so they force themselves to sing low so they can fit in and not be made fun of. The choir directors or voice teachers are responsible for letting their students know that it is okay to sing either high or low and should not push for either one of them. They should allow their students to sing what they please without having to worry about the social ramification. As students are going through puberty, it may be smart to bring up the changes in their voices (especially if they are involved in voice performance) while they are learning how the growth they go through puberty.
What side are you on?
Monday, February 18, 2013
Dispelling Vocal Myths
1: We have to feel the air: She states that students believed that if they feel the air going past their vocal cords, then they are inhaling correctly. This is a myth because when you can hear the air rushing past the vocal cords it is actually drying out the cords and can cause an unsteady onset.
2: We need to work to get the air, we must inhale against resistance: This misconception is more common than myth number one according to Deirdre. She says that students feel the need to keep the core activated the entire time they are inhaling so they feel like they are working for the breath.
3: The air pushes the diaphragm down: The singer tries to the feel the air pushing the diaphragm down when this actually cannot be felt.
4: Lungs fill upward: This myth seems to be a concept we believe early in life. Deirdre explains this by talking about going to the doctor and the doctor tells you to take a deep breath. He or she demonstrates by lifting the shoulders. The way to fix this misconception is to demonstrate a relaxed abdomen and to feel the breath expand the rib cage, which is at the bottom of the lungs.
Exhalation myths:
1:The diaphragm inhales and exhales: The singer believes the diaphragm needs to help with exhaling when the diaphragm only helps to inhale.
2:Abdominal muscles push out the air: The abdomen muscles are not used to push out the air. The oxygen enters the lungs and as the oxygen is taken through the blood stream, the lungs exhale the CO2 gas in the lungs. The lungs simply deflate like a balloon.
3:The great panacea is breath support: This is when singers hear that they need better support for the tone, so they compromise by tightening the abdomen and pushing the air out as hard as possible. This creates tension in the glottis and damages the student's vocal technique.
There are a few myths about singing that I didn't necessarily know about. I am excited to hear what you all have to say.
"Why Should I Teach Kids to Sing". Summary
Here is my summary of "Why Should I Teach Kids to Sing". Sorry it is kind of late. video up comming
"Why Should I Teach Kids to Sing" by Marcia McCarry talks
about the basics to early childhood pedagogy and who, when, how, what and why to
teach at this early age. McCarry says the "who" is any child who shows
a love for singing, and interest in taking lessons. These are usually children who are singing
constantly throughout the day as a natural behavior. When to start depends on the level of
interest; kindermusik classes can begin as early as two or three years old and
generally go through kindergarten or first grade. After that individual lessons can begin if
the student still shows interest. As for
"how" McCarry reminds potential teachers that most children use their
lower voices to begin with and suggests sirens and descending slides to work on
head voice for both boys and girls. She
gives several suggestions for early repertoire books such as Kids Stage and
Screen by Louise
Lerch, and says that children can even be a part of choosing their own music. Teachers
can focus on "what" to teach children such as respiration, phonation,
resonant singing, diction, and expression, just like older students. McCarry suggests that music reading can be
learned at home through a computer program so as not to take time away from
singing during the lesson time. She emphasizes that praise is a key component
to teaching young children and their hard work should be encouraged both in
studio and at home. The "why" seems to be because there are children
out there who want to learn and because “singing is a learned behavior; it is not
some type of gift bestowed upon a talented few”, according to Kenneth Philips
author of Teaching Kids to Sing. It is important for teachers to be
available to young students because both the student and teacher grow from the process
and what a joy to the teachers to aid students in doing what they want to do
most.
The Business Plan
Here is my summary! I unfortunately have to post my video tomorrow morning, sorry all.
Sunday, February 17, 2013
Instructions
Hi all,
Instructions for your presentations.
1. Don't forget to accept your invitation to be a blog author.
2. Read your article, and write a summary. This is what you will post as text on the blog, in addition to your video.
3. Record yourself with your computer or phone and upload to youtube. (This is much easier than uploading directly to blog, though you can do that if you wish)
4. Log in to blog and create a post! When you go to upload your video, you can choose to upload from youtube (again, much faster than direct). Also include your summary.
5. Don't forget, this needs to be completed the day BEFORE the article is listed on the syllabus.
Watching other presentations:
1. You need to watch each presentation before class, there might be a quiz regarding the material presented.
2. Leave a comment on the blog for each presentation.
2. Leave a comment on the blog for each presentation.
Thanks! I hope you are all doing well!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)